The Expanded Environment
The Expanded Environment is a nonprofit 501c3 organization devoted to demonstrating alternate ways of responsibly and synthetically integrating biological and ecological agents into the built world. Its goal is to assist governments, municipalities, provinces, organizations, businesses, and individuals to understand, appreciate and envision a more productive relationship between architectural and biological systems.
7 Comment on “FERAL CITY”
Foragings:: The latest news, resources, designs and more » The Metropolitan Field Guide
December 17, 2010 at 2:13 pm
[…] Feral City:: From Animal Architecture is a look at a student project which asked the question “What if we introduced [or re-introduced] zoological/ entomological/ botanical specimens into our everyday lives?” The result is a series of intriguing ideas and designs. […]
Paul Chittenden
January 25, 2011 at 10:14 pm
Very interesting article. I originally migrated to this site over from Linkedin when my curiosity got me wondering what animalarchitecture.org could be about.
Seth’s project seems really cool, but I tend to think that the main drawback would be the cost of the property, What if this was something that you could introduce on top of buildings? Just a thought…
Ned Dodington
January 26, 2011 at 10:42 am
Paul,
Thanks for the comment. Yes this is often a real-world concern for projects such as these. I believe that Seth is suggesting that Feral City might occur in a place and time with a degree of urban decay, that is to say that the buildings would be ruins or at least not presently used. Seth, what do you think?
Seth Barnard
January 27, 2011 at 11:40 pm
Ned, you are right, to a degree… Detroit, St. Petersburg, Sao Paolo or any decaying city would be intrinsically inhabited by some kind of life form. Yet even in boom cities like New York, there are still districts, parcels, and other areas uninhabited (also factor diurnal and nocturnal conditions) by human activity. Furthermore, hundreds of urban buildings are occupied solely by machines (i.e. a tunnel’s ventilation shaft, 4th image down) used to power infrastructure… couldn’t these synthetic interiors lend themselves to become habitats of some kind?
The premise of the thesis is to create scenarios in which animals and humans function symbiotically/ simultaneously… scenarios of contact. All of the processes in the thesis are so because they function “naturally” (willfully), not domestically. For example, although humans construct synthetic hives, bees produce honey instinctively- by their own will. In other words, the systems function as parasitic cooperations.
The notion of property still exists on rooftops. Even so, if you look at the first second to last image, a net of greenery sits on the roof of an existing tenement in New York. The project was executed with the idea that animals have no concept of property: they live between the floor boards, attics, cellars, corners, garages, roofs, window sills, etc.. those “left over” spaces. Architectures are inserted just as organisms insert themselves on every strata of civilization. The great thing about the city is the fact that it has many ecosystems on a vertical and horizontal plane… so the albino snake could live in the subway, while the coyote occupies the street, hawks roost on window sills, and the plants occupy the roof, and the insects occupy the plants, etc, etc, etc….
Erica
January 30, 2011 at 11:59 pm
I think the real question is – if Eve hadn’t been tempted by that forbidden fruit – would our world look more like this today?
Bravo to Seth!
Ned Dodington
January 31, 2011 at 9:48 am
Thanks for the comment Erica. I think the idea that Feral City might be a kind of Eden is really interesting. But as to your question: If you mean to ask “have we been damned by a higher power to live in urban areas because of original sin” then, well I think a few folks might disagree… if on the other hand you’re suggesting that the human capacity for knowledge, language and technology has led to our current urban dilemmas then perhaps this is “the question” to ask. Now, how do we respond? I think Seth’s proposal is just such a response.
Sian
May 24, 2011 at 4:22 am
It is definately possible for animals and humans to co exist in urban jungles. It is just a matter of providing the right conditions ie food and habitat and animals will take advantage of it. The problem is that we humans build human oriented habitats, and destroy others by doing so, pushing them into other habitats.
The trick is to build up the food web for larger animals to survive, through recognising niches in which animals can inhabit. For snakes and cyotes to be around we need to be able to live with rats and mice and other ‘pests’ without exterminating them.
I agree with Seth that if we provide habitat, the animals (if there are any left in the area) will come. I have a pair of micro bats that hang in the bathroom lampshade and fly through the house at night catching moths. Possums, bandicoots, water dragon lizards, parrots and birds all share our block with us. I do live in a semi rural semi urban part of Australia which has a lot of intact habitat and wild life and have direct experience how to enhance your surroundings to benefit animals.